Click my face to go back to my home page!

 

Tony on MySpace



My photo album
Visit my blog

Google
Web
northrup.org

Info on my camera equipment
Info on my books
Info on my magazine articles


Frequently asked questions
Info about this site's server hardware, software, and logs
Info about this site's server hardware, software, and logs

My Canon Extension Tubes Review

I have a set of Kenko extension tubes that I've used with three Canon lenses--the 85/1.8, 28-135IS, and the 100-400L. Here are the things I don't like about the extension tubes:

Adding extension tubes reduces the minimum focusing distance. It also dramatically reduces the maximum focusing distance. Saying that you lose infinity focus is an understatement--when I add extension tubes to my 85/1.8 lens, adjusting the focus ring on the lens changes the focusing distance some very minor amount, say, from 1 inch to 1 1/8" from the front element of the lens. You basically have to focus by moving the camera closer to or farther from the subject, or by adding/removing extension tubes. (Using a true macro lens solves this problem)

As you decrease the focusing distance, depth-of-field decreases dramatically. This means that you must use a smaller aperture to keep your subject in focus. Smaller apertures yield longer shutter speeds, which means you need to use a tripod. Your on-board flash won't work well--they make special, expensive flashes for macro shots. Here's a shot where I didn't have the option of using a tripod, because I had to stand on a bench to see into the nest. I used the smallest aperture possible that still gave me a shutter speed I could hand-hold, and as you can see, depth-of-field is very small. (URL may wrap to two lines)

Even at the smallest possible aperture, my 85/1.8 lens doesn't give enough depth-of-field for macro subjects. True macro lenses have very small minimum apertures, which reduces this problem. This picture of one of those tiny cactuses is a good example, because the front of the leaf is in focus, but the rest of the cactus is very out of focus--and the whole thing is only a couple of inches long.

 

With that said, I still keep the extension tubes around. Macro lenses are definitely better if you have the cash.

Add an anonymous comment!
Hide comments!


Sorry, but what is kimerikas? Jane. (3/25/2008, 8:44 PM)
Nice iPod earphones! Gives a very professional impression. (1/22/2008, 2:28 PM)
A "Macro Rail" is also a good investment if you can find one. (1/16/2008, 6:23 PM)
Thanks for the write up. I was looking at getting an extension tube to save some money, but i think ill save up and get a decent lens made for macro. Thanks again. (9/20/2007, 7:22 AM)
lczqyk farnqgcvl lhakqrmf yqdxanc lbuk hgfvetxi bxqwpafun (9/9/2007, 2:58 PM)
Hello! great idea of color of this siyte! (8/8/2007, 6:00 AM)
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! bdveuqxagt (6/22/2007, 8:30 PM)