Tony Northrup Photography

Discussion Forums

Portfolio

Animals
   Tigers
   Lions
   Monkeys
   Pigs
   ...more

Birds
   Ducks
   Eagles
   Chickens
   Turkeys
   ...more

Insects
   Butterflies

Reptiles

Places
   Paris
   Rome
   Florence
   Prague
   San Fran
   Boston
   Chicago
   ...more

Flowers
  Roses

My Canon Extension Tubes Review

I have a set of Kenko extension tubes that I've used with three Canon lenses--the 85/1.8, 28-135IS, and the 100-400L. Here are the things I don't like about the extension tubes:

Adding extension tubes reduces the minimum focusing distance. It also dramatically reduces the maximum focusing distance. Saying that you lose infinity focus is an understatement--when I add extension tubes to my 85/1.8 lens, adjusting the focus ring on the lens changes the focusing distance some very minor amount, say, from 1 inch to 1 1/8" from the front element of the lens. You basically have to focus by moving the camera closer to or farther from the subject, or by adding/removing extension tubes. (Using a true macro lens solves this problem)

As you decrease the focusing distance, depth-of-field decreases dramatically. This means that you must use a smaller aperture to keep your subject in focus. Smaller apertures yield longer shutter speeds, which means you need to use a tripod. Your on-board flash won't work well--they make special, expensive flashes for macro shots. Here's a shot where I didn't have the option of using a tripod, because I had to stand on a bench to see into the nest. I used the smallest aperture possible that still gave me a shutter speed I could hand-hold, and as you can see, depth-of-field is very small. (URL may wrap to two lines)

Even at the smallest possible aperture, my 85/1.8 lens doesn't give enough depth-of-field for macro subjects. True macro lenses have very small minimum apertures, which reduces this problem. This picture of one of those tiny cactuses is a good example, because the front of the leaf is in focus, but the rest of the cactus is very out of focus--and the whole thing is only a couple of inches long.

 

With that said, I still keep the extension tubes around. Macro lenses are definitely better if you have the cash.

Add an anonymous comment!
Hide comments!


the dof on the cactus isnt bad at all! anyway, in 'proper' macro who wants to see the background? blur it baby!!! (7/22/2009, 12:37 AM)
Love the bird nest shot. Shallow depth of field makes the subject stand out beautifully when used right. (3/2/2009, 8:11 PM)
In most cases it is illegal to take photo's of birds on their nests (1/11/2009, 7:55 AM)
Sorry, but what is kimerikas? Jane. (3/25/2008, 8:44 PM)
Nice iPod earphones! Gives a very professional impression. (1/22/2008, 2:28 PM)
A "Macro Rail" is also a good investment if you can find one. (1/16/2008, 6:23 PM)
Thanks for the write up. I was looking at getting an extension tube to save some money, but i think ill save up and get a decent lens made for macro. Thanks again. (9/20/2007, 7:22 AM)
lczqyk farnqgcvl lhakqrmf yqdxanc lbuk hgfvetxi bxqwpafun (9/9/2007, 2:58 PM)
Hello! great idea of color of this siyte! (8/8/2007, 6:00 AM)
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! bdveuqxagt (6/22/2007, 8:30 PM)